Assembly Bill 530 (AB 530) is currently under consideration in Nevada, prompting significant discussion among residents and policymakers alike. This legislation addresses the funding of critical infrastructure, such as roads and bridges, which is undeniably a priority for the state.

However, AB 530 proposes a concerning approach: it seeks to increase motor vehicle fuel taxes in Clark County without requiring approval from Clark County voters. This shift in policy raises serious questions about fairness and accountability, setting the stage for why many believe it would be detrimental to the state. 

A Threat to Voter Rights 

Right now, the rules say that if the government wants to keep increasing motor vehicle fuel taxes after 2026, they have to get a thumbs-up from Clark County voters in a big election that year. It’s a chance for regular people like you and me to say, “Yeah, I’m okay with paying more at the pump,” or “No way, that’s too much.” AB 530 would toss that out the window. Instead, it would let the Clark County Commission—a small group of officials—raise those taxes with just a two-thirds vote among themselves. No election, no public say. That’s a big shift, and it’s not hard to see why it feels unfair. 

An Unwelcome Tax Increase 

Imagine you’re at the grocery store, and someone decides to tack an extra $10 onto your bill without asking. You’d be mad, right? That’s what this feels like—a tax hike that hits your wallet without you getting a vote. Gas isn’t cheap already, and for a lot of Nevadans—especially folks who drive to work, run small businesses, or just try to get by on tight budgets—this could make life even tougher. Fuel taxes hit harder if you don’t have a lot of extra cash, because a bigger chunk of your paycheck ends up going to the pump. It’s what people call “regressive,” meaning it’s not as fair to those who are already stretched thin. 

Infrastructure vs. Fairness 

Now, don’t get me wrong—roads and bridges matter. No one wants potholes or crumbling highways. But there’s a right way to pay for them, and AB 530 isn’t it. The current setup lets voters decide if they’re willing to chip in more for infrastructure. That’s how it should be: a group decision, not a top-down call by a handful of commissioners. When you take that choice away, it’s not just about money—it’s about trust. If the government can raise taxes like this without asking, what’s next? It sets up a system where Nevadans might feel like their voices don’t count. 

Why AB 530 Spells Trouble 

So why is AB 530 a terrible idea for Nevada? It boils down to three things: it’s a sneaky tax increase, it ignores voters, and it puts more pressure on people who are already feeling the pinch. There’s a better way—let the public decide in 2026, like the law originally planned. That keeps things fair and square. If Nevada’s leaders really need more money for roads, they should make their case to us, the people who’ll be paying it, and let us have the final word. 

Stay Up to Date

Subscribe now to get biweekly updates on the real scoop from this legislative session, delivered straight to your inbox.