We've all heard the horror stories of deteriorating government finances in the Silver State. What we rarely hear is that the supposed "shortfall" in the state budget has resulted directly from higher spending, not from any decline in tax revenues.
Despite all the hand-wringing during the 2009 Legislative Session, the 2009-11 legislatively approved state budget will spend 31.2 percent more on an inflation-adjusted, per-person basis than did the 2003-05 budget. That amounts to $275 more spending per person than occurred just six years ago.
In fact, while the majority of the much-ballyhooed "cuts" to state spending this biennium will occur in FY11, inflation-adjusted, per-capita spending for that year will still be higher than at any point in recent history prior to FY06. Given the recent upward trend in state spending, it is blatantly obvious that any supposed fiscal "crisis" is primarily the result of an undisciplined and unsustainable growth in spending. Consider this chart:
Note that when state policymakers saw the then-record-breaking 2003 tax hikes begin to generate more than $1 billion in additional revenues following economic recovery, they used much of that additional revenue to create new programs and expand the size of government. Now, the panic over "cuts" and the corresponding calls for yet further tax hikes are a direct result of the new spending that fed off that last round of tax hikes.
Of course, this increasing tax burden is also generated by extravagant annual government employee pay raises. Nevada state employees are eligible for a variety of annual pay raises, including cost-of-living adjustments, step increases and longevity pay. The following table shows the cumulative impact these pay raises can have over just a short time. Even if only cost-of-living adjustments and step increases were considered, a state employee hired in FY01 would have received a 75 percent increase in the base rate of pay within eight years — all without any elevation in rank or increase in responsibilities.
Year
COLA
Step Increase
Total Raise
Cumulative Raise
FY02
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
8.5%
FY03
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
17.7%
FY04
0.0%
4.5%
4.5%
23.0%
FY05
2.0%
4.5%
6.5%
31.0%
FY06
2.0%
4.5%
6.5%
39.5%
FY07
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
51.4%
FY08
2.0%
4.5%
6.5%
61.2%
FY09
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
74.9%
Something particularly troubling that this chart makes clear is the arbitrary nature of cost-of-living adjustments. These raises have been set in advance by Nevada lawmakers in complete ignorance of how the cost of living will actually change. Indeed, cost-of-living raises have been awarded to state employees during years in which the cost of living in Nevada has actually declined. From all appearances, cost-of-living adjustments have served as little more than a vehicle for a public-employee-dominated state legislature to funnel patronage to public-employee-union interests in exchange for political support.
The flipside of that coin was revealed in the political backlash when Governor Gibbons initially proposed 6 percent salary reductions for the 2009-11 biennium. The uproar ensued even though such a reduction would have more accurately reflected changes in the current cost of living. Of course, in government, salary reductions due to declining costs of living are unheard of. Given the arbitrary nature of this construct, it is no wonder that it is largely nonexistent in the private sector.
The combination of lawmakers' unending desire to spend on new programs and a budgeting process that is engineered primarily for the benefit of public employee unions has left ordinary Nevadans stuck holding a bill that keeps getting new charges added to it. Sure, revenues are down slightly from the 2007-09 biennium, but that wouldn't have created the current level of panic among policymakers and commentators if there hadn't been such a massive increase in spending in recent years. It is clear that any budget "shortfall" that is experienced in Nevada is primarily the result of attempting to grow the size of government.
In 2009, Nevadans paid for that effort with a 19 percent overall increase in the state tax burden. Now some lawmakers — particularly those on the Interim Finance Committee — are already posturing with schemes to dwarf that amount when the legislature reconvenes in 2011.
Lawmakers should learn to control their appetite for profligate state spending before they even consider coming back to taxpayers with more demands for even higher taxes.
Geoffrey Lawrence is a fiscal policy analyst at the Nevada Policy Research Institute.
Geoffrey Lawrence is director of research at Nevada Policy. Lawrence has broad experience as a financial executive in the public and private sectors and as a think tank analyst. Lawrence has been Chief Financial Officer of several growth-stage and publicly traded manufacturing companies and managed all financial reporting, internal control, and external compliance efforts with regulatory agencies including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Lawrence has also served as the senior appointee to the Nevada State Controller’s Office, where he oversaw the state’s external financial reporting, covering nearly $10 billion in annual transactions. During each year of Lawrence’s tenure, the state received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Award from the Government Finance Officers’ Association. From 2008 to 2014, Lawrence was director of research and legislative affairs at Nevada Policy and helped the institute develop its platform of ideas to advance and defend a free society. Lawrence has also written for the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation, with particular expertise in state budgets and labor economics. He was delighted at the opportunity to return to Nevada Policy in 2022 while concurrently serving as research director at the Reason Foundation. Lawrence holds an M.A. in international economics from American University in Washington, D.C., an M.S. and a B.S. in accounting from Western Governors University, and a B.A. in international relations from the University of North Carolina at Pembroke. He lives in Las Vegas with his beautiful wife, Jenna, and their two kids, Carson Hayek and Sage Aynne.
What revenue problem?
We've all heard the horror stories of deteriorating government finances in the Silver State. What we rarely hear is that the supposed "shortfall" in the state budget has resulted directly from higher spending, not from any decline in tax revenues.
Despite all the hand-wringing during the 2009 Legislative Session, the 2009-11 legislatively approved state budget will spend 31.2 percent more on an inflation-adjusted, per-person basis than did the 2003-05 budget. That amounts to $275 more spending per person than occurred just six years ago.
In fact, while the majority of the much-ballyhooed "cuts" to state spending this biennium will occur in FY11, inflation-adjusted, per-capita spending for that year will still be higher than at any point in recent history prior to FY06. Given the recent upward trend in state spending, it is blatantly obvious that any supposed fiscal "crisis" is primarily the result of an undisciplined and unsustainable growth in spending. Consider this chart:
Note that when state policymakers saw the then-record-breaking 2003 tax hikes begin to generate more than $1 billion in additional revenues following economic recovery, they used much of that additional revenue to create new programs and expand the size of government. Now, the panic over "cuts" and the corresponding calls for yet further tax hikes are a direct result of the new spending that fed off that last round of tax hikes.
Of course, this increasing tax burden is also generated by extravagant annual government employee pay raises. Nevada state employees are eligible for a variety of annual pay raises, including cost-of-living adjustments, step increases and longevity pay. The following table shows the cumulative impact these pay raises can have over just a short time. Even if only cost-of-living adjustments and step increases were considered, a state employee hired in FY01 would have received a 75 percent increase in the base rate of pay within eight years — all without any elevation in rank or increase in responsibilities.
Year
COLA
Step Increase
Total Raise
Cumulative Raise
FY02
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
8.5%
FY03
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
17.7%
FY04
0.0%
4.5%
4.5%
23.0%
FY05
2.0%
4.5%
6.5%
31.0%
FY06
2.0%
4.5%
6.5%
39.5%
FY07
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
51.4%
FY08
2.0%
4.5%
6.5%
61.2%
FY09
4.0%
4.5%
8.5%
74.9%
Something particularly troubling that this chart makes clear is the arbitrary nature of cost-of-living adjustments. These raises have been set in advance by Nevada lawmakers in complete ignorance of how the cost of living will actually change. Indeed, cost-of-living raises have been awarded to state employees during years in which the cost of living in Nevada has actually declined. From all appearances, cost-of-living adjustments have served as little more than a vehicle for a public-employee-dominated state legislature to funnel patronage to public-employee-union interests in exchange for political support.
The flipside of that coin was revealed in the political backlash when Governor Gibbons initially proposed 6 percent salary reductions for the 2009-11 biennium. The uproar ensued even though such a reduction would have more accurately reflected changes in the current cost of living. Of course, in government, salary reductions due to declining costs of living are unheard of. Given the arbitrary nature of this construct, it is no wonder that it is largely nonexistent in the private sector.
The combination of lawmakers' unending desire to spend on new programs and a budgeting process that is engineered primarily for the benefit of public employee unions has left ordinary Nevadans stuck holding a bill that keeps getting new charges added to it. Sure, revenues are down slightly from the 2007-09 biennium, but that wouldn't have created the current level of panic among policymakers and commentators if there hadn't been such a massive increase in spending in recent years. It is clear that any budget "shortfall" that is experienced in Nevada is primarily the result of attempting to grow the size of government.
In 2009, Nevadans paid for that effort with a 19 percent overall increase in the state tax burden. Now some lawmakers — particularly those on the Interim Finance Committee — are already posturing with schemes to dwarf that amount when the legislature reconvenes in 2011.
Lawmakers should learn to control their appetite for profligate state spending before they even consider coming back to taxpayers with more demands for even higher taxes.
Geoffrey Lawrence is a fiscal policy analyst at the Nevada Policy Research Institute.
Geoffrey Lawrence is director of research at Nevada Policy. Lawrence has broad experience as a financial executive in the public and private sectors and as a think tank analyst. Lawrence has been Chief Financial Officer of several growth-stage and publicly traded manufacturing companies and managed all financial reporting, internal control, and external compliance efforts with regulatory agencies including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Lawrence has also served as the senior appointee to the Nevada State Controller’s Office, where he oversaw the state’s external financial reporting, covering nearly $10 billion in annual transactions. During each year of Lawrence’s tenure, the state received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Award from the Government Finance Officers’ Association. From 2008 to 2014, Lawrence was director of research and legislative affairs at Nevada Policy and helped the institute develop its platform of ideas to advance and defend a free society. Lawrence has also written for the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation, with particular expertise in state budgets and labor economics. He was delighted at the opportunity to return to Nevada Policy in 2022 while concurrently serving as research director at the Reason Foundation. Lawrence holds an M.A. in international economics from American University in Washington, D.C., an M.S. and a B.S. in accounting from Western Governors University, and a B.A. in international relations from the University of North Carolina at Pembroke. He lives in Las Vegas with his beautiful wife, Jenna, and their two kids, Carson Hayek and Sage Aynne.
Latest at Nevada Policy
View More
Nevada Policy Decries Committee Decision to Disregard Needs of NV Students
Lombardo aborda la elección de escuela en su discurso sobre el estado del Estado
La falta de transparencia de los legisladores perjudica a los nevadenses
Join the fight to save Nevada.
Sign up for Nevada Policy’s weekly emails to stay up to date on the most pressing issues facing Nevada today.