fbpx
Nevada Policy

Press

Press Releases

Clark, Washoe teachers unions drop 1,500+ members
 
For immediate release
Contact Ashley Johnson, 702-222-0642

LAS VEGAS — Membership in Nevada’s two largest teachers unions experienced a dramatic drop over the summer, the Nevada Policy Research Institute announced today.

Including new teachers not joining the union, Clark County Education Association membership fell by 1,338 and Washoe Education Association membership fell by 163. The information was provided by the Clark and Washoe County School Districts, which use automatic payroll deduction to collect dues on behalf of the union.

As of Sept. 10, 2015, only 9,526 of the CCSD’s 18,275 teachers had union dues — which total nearly $800 per year — deducted. That means CCEA membership has fallen to 52 percent of licensed personnel. In April 2015, the union represented 10,731 of the CCSD’s 18,142 teachers or 59 percent of teachers. The membership drop means that teachers will keep over $1 million more of their own money, instead of sending it to CCEA officials.

As of Sept. 16, 2015, just 2,289 of WCSD’s 4,068 teachers had union dues — which cost around $720 a year —  deducted. WEA membership has dropped to 56 percent. In April 2015, the union represented 2,402 of WCSD’s 4,018 licensed personnel or 60 percent of teachers. The membership decline means that teachers will keep over $117,000 more of their own money, instead of sending it to WEA officials.

The 1,500-plus teacher exodus comes after NPRI held its fourth annual summer union opt-out campaign to let school district employees know they can drop union membership from July 1 to July 15 and to inform new educators that they need not join at all. The Institute reached school district employees through billboards throughout Las Vegas, in emails sent to their taxpayer-funded addresses and through interviews in the media and its own publications and on social media.

The CCEA’s membership decline has been especially pronounced and is even more dramatic considering that CCSD has 1,100 more teachers in 2015 than in 2012.

In response to the news, NPRI’s Executive Vice President, Victor Joecks, issued the following remarks:

This summer, more than 1,500 Clark and Washoe County teachers exercised their right to drop union members or not join their respective education associations. Teachers, empowered by information from the Nevada Policy Research Institute on when and how to leave, have voted with their feet and will save more than $1.1 million this year alone.

Since NPRI began this campaign in 2012, more than 3,500 school district employees have left or not joined the Nevada State Education Association. The free choice of these individuals has allowed them to keep over $4 million of their own money, instead of sending it to union officials making six-figure salaries and providing lousy customer service.

Joecks mentioned that membership in the Washoe Education Support Association has fallen to just 526 of WCSD’s 2,711 support staff members or just 19 percent. The Education Support Employees Association has also fallen under 50 percent and is currently facing a vote with the Teamsters Union on which union will represent support staff employees in CCSD. 

Joecks concluded:

With membership levels hovering just above 50 percent for Nevada’s two largest teachers unions, these results show that now is the time for union recertification.

With CCEA becoming the bargaining agent for CCSD teachers in 1969, only a handful of current CCSD teachers have ever had a chance to vote on if they want CCEA as their bargaining agent. Now teachers are voting with their feet and leaving CCEA in droves. 

Lawmakers should use the rumored upcoming special session to pass a union recertification bill that would require unions to get a majority vote of those it represents in bargaining every two years to remain the bargaining agent.

The trend is clear. Nevada’s teachers unions don’t represent a near majority of teachers, and those teachers should not be forced into contracts by an organization they never voted for, have left and want no part of.

###

NPRI unveils NevadaESA.com

For Immediate Release

Contact Chantal Lovell

September 1, 2015

702- 222-0642, 951-295-4855 (cell)

LAS VEGAS — Responding to the overwhelming interest in Nevada’s new Education Savings Accounts program, the Nevada Policy Research Institute unveiled a new website today, NevadaESA.com.

With an extensive list of frequently asked questions that are continually being updated, tuition and contact information for Nevada’s private schools, an events list and application tips, the new website will become the go-to resource for parents and schools looking for more information on ESAs.

In response to launch of the new site, NPRI’s President Sharon J. Rossie offered the following remarks:

Since Gov. Sandoval signed Senate Bill 302 in June, NPRI staff have spoken with thousands of Nevada parents who are eager to find out what Education Savings Accounts mean for their children and learn how to best utilize the grants. NevadaESA.com will serve as a great tool for everyone with an interest in ESAs, from parents who have heard about the program and need more information, to those looking for application assistance, to private schools wanting to learn more about what the law means for them.  

In the coming weeks and months, we will reach even more parents — particularly those in traditionally disadvantaged communities — to let them know they now have options when it comes to their children’s education and we are excited to have a place to send them to learn more.

For many Nevada families, Education Savings Accounts mean their children can, for the first time ever, attend private school, be taught at home, or receive the individualized education needed for life-long success. Children who have been stuck in failing schools now have a path to attend a school that is exceptional, and we want to make sure all parents learn how they can direct their child’s education dollars.

Rossie added that NevadaESA.com will be continually updated as SB302 makes its way through the regulatory process so those interested have the most up-to-date information at their fingertips.

###

Parent: ESAs will improve my child’s education; NPRI: ACLU lawsuit is legally flawed

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact Victor Joecks, 702-222-0642

LAS VEGAS — Responding to news that the American Civil Liberties Union has filed a Constitutional challenge against Nevada’s groundbreaking Education Savings Account program, Nevada parent Glynis Gallegos offered the following comments. Because of ESAs, Gallegos has taken her son from a public school and put him in a private school.

“Education Savings Accounts provide a choice for my child’s education. The poor performing schools in my neighborhood don’t provide a positive choice for my son. Right now, my son is attending a private school, because of this new law.

“Education Savings Accounts will improve education for inner city children. Low-income families don’t have a choice. This is allowing for an equal choice for all families, regardless of income levels.”

The ACLU’s challenge is based on Nevada’s “Blaine” Amendment, which passed in the late 1800s and reads, “No public funds of any kind or character whatever, State, County or Municipal, shall be used for sectarian purpose.” At the time sectarian meant “Catholic.” Nativists pushed Blaine Amendments throughout the country to prevent public dollars from going to Catholic schools. Public schools at the time had a “pervasively Protestant character.”

With Education Savings Accounts, however, government funds are put into a parent-controlled account, and parents decide how the monies — which are no longer public funds — are spent.

NPRI Executive Vice President Victor Joecks then shared the following thoughts on the lawsuit.

“In less than month, over 2,800 parents have already applied for an Education Savings Account and the chance to personalize the education of their children. Failed by unaccountable public schools that have nevertheless, for decades, received regular funding increases, parents around Nevada are eager to provide their children with the individually customized education now available from resources such as online schools, private schools, tutors and more.

“It is a shame that Nevada’s ACLU would attempt to prevent these parents from obtaining better educations for their children.

“It is important to emphasize that these funds go into a parentally controlled account. This is no longer government money, but money given to parents to find the best education for their children. This is why the Blaine Amendment challenge should fail.”

Joecks noted that last year, the Arizona Supreme Court deemed Education Savings Accounts constitutional despite Arizona having a Blaine Amendment that is more strict than Nevada’s.

“It’s ironic that the ACLU is seeking to stop the ability of parents, like Glynis Gallegos, to improve the education of their children under the Blaine Amendment. That’s because that section of the Nevada Constitution has explicitly anti-Catholic origins,” said Joecks.

“Regardless, it’s important to remember that the state funds are going to a parent-controlled account for the purpose of providing their student a better education. After the dollars reach the ESA, they are no longer public funds, and the parent then decides how the money is spent, including if it will be spent at a religious school or not.”

Joecks then described how Education Savings Accounts actually increase per-pupil spending. Nevada’s average per-pupil spending is $9,500, while an ESA is worth just 60 percent of that amount. Therefore, as more students use ESAs, the per-pupil funds for current public school students actually goes up.

“When it comes to increasing per-pupil spending, ESAs are the best thing that ever happened to Nevada education. That’s because although ESA do remove a portion of a former student’s funding, they also remove the public school’s entire responsibility to educate that child. The more students who use ESA, the higher per-pupil funding within public schools will go.

“We know through decades of experience that higher per-pupil education spending won’t increase student achievement, but the competitive pressure from Nevada’s ESA program will, as it has in states around the country.

“Given both the Arizona precedent and a clear understanding of how Nevada’s ESA program is structured, ESA are constitutional. The court should dismiss this case immediately.”

###

NPRI unveils NevadaESA.com

LAS VEGAS — Responding to the overwhelming interest in Nevada’s new Education Savings Accounts program, the Nevada Policy Research Institute unveiled a new website today, NevadaESA.com.

With an extensive list of frequently asked questions that are continually being updated, tuition and contact information for Nevada’s private schools, an events list and application tips, the new website will become the go-to resource for parents and schools looking for more information on ESAs.

In response to launch of the new site, NPRI’s President Sharon J. Rossie offered the following remarks:

Since Gov. Sandoval signed Senate Bill 302 in June, NPRI staff have spoken with thousands of Nevada parents eager to find out what Education Savings Accounts mean for their children and learn how to best utilize the grants. NevadaESA.com will serve as a great tool for everyone with an interest in ESAs, from parents who have heard about the program and need more information, to those looking for application assistance, to private schools wanting to learn more about what the law means for them.  

In the coming weeks and months, we will reach even more parents — particularly those in traditionally disadvantaged communities — to let them know they now have options when it comes to their children’s education and we are excited to have a place to send them to learn more.

For many Nevada families, Education Savings Accounts mean their children can, for the first time ever, attend private school, be taught at home, or receive the individualized education needed for life-long success. Children who have been stuck in failing schools now have a path to attend a school that is exceptional, and we want to make sure all parents learn how they can direct their child’s education dollars.

Rossie added that NevadaESA.com will be continually updated as SB302 makes its way through the regulatory process so those interested have the most up-to-date information at their fingertips.

###

Survey finds more than 25% of union households unaware of right to opt-out of union membership

For Immediate Release

Contact Chantal Lovell

August 17, 2015

702- 222-0642, 951-295-4855 (cell)

LAS VEGAS — Today, the Nevada Policy Research Institute released the results of a new survey showing that more than a quarter of union households in Nevada don’t realize they can opt out of union membership and stop paying a portion of their union dues without fear of penalty. 

The survey is part of National Employee Freedom Week (NEFW), an annual national campaign spearheaded by NPRI that informs union members about their workplace rights, specifically their right to leave their union. NEFW runs Sunday, August 16th through Saturday, August 22nd and consists of a record 99 organizations in 42 states.  

To view a list of the grassroots coalition that makes up NEFW, click here. To view the NEFW website, click here.

The Google Consumer Survey poll surveyed 300 union members and union households in Nevada and found that 27.7 percent of respondents answered “No” to the question, “Are you aware that you can opt-out of union membership and of paying all union dues without losing your job or any other penalty?” Nationally, the figure is 39.2 percent.

“These survey results show that there are over 45,000 union members in Nevada who don’t know they can opt out of union membership, even though Nevada is a right-to-work state,” said Victor Joecks, executive vice president of NPRI and the executive director of NEFW. “These results show why NPRI has needed to work for the last four years to help over 2,000 teachers and school district employees opt out of union membership.

“Too many union employees simply don’t understand that union membership is optional.”

Additionally, the NEFW coalition released the following survey results:

  • Nationwide, more than 1 in 4 union members answered "Yes" in response to the question, "If it were possible to opt out of membership in a labor union without losing your job or any other penalty, would you do it?"
  • Nationwide more than 3 in 4 union members responded "Yes" when asked, "Should employees have the right to decide, without force or penalty, whether to join or leave a labor union?" 

In addition to educating union members about their rights, NEFW also helps them exercise these rights. The NEFW website features an interactive map that includes sample opt-out letters and information about union alternatives.

“Across the country there are millions of union members who want to leave their unions, but don’t know that opting out of union membership is possible,” said Joecks. “Through the work of National Employee Freedom Week, nearly 100 organizations throughout the country are working to share that empowering message within their circles of influence.”

The surveys were conducted by Google Consumer Surveys, between June 24th and July 28th, 2015. They each surveyed roughly 300 people and have a margin of error of approximately 6 percent.

###

ESA applications now available online

For Immediate Release

Contact Chantal Lovell

July 30, 2015

702- 222-0642, 951-295-4855 (cell)

LAS VEGAS — Families who wish to use Nevada’s new Education Savings Accounts program may now file applications, the Nevada Treasurer’s office announced Thursday.

Parents may apply online for their child’s ESA — worth $5,100 to $5,700 — through the State Treasurer’s website. The Nevada Policy Research Institute will be offering free, in-person application assistance from 4 to 7 p.m. on Friday, July 31st at its open house in Las Vegas.

Though the funds will not be available until early 2016, by completing an early application form, parents will ensure that their child’s time spent in public school during the 2014-2015 school year will be counted toward the 100-day public school attendance requirement needed, under the law, to qualify for an ESA.

Even if parents apply for an ESA now, they still can keep their children in public schools until the ESAs are funded. According to guidelines from the Treasurer’s Office, the accounts will be funded in early April 2016.

NPRI, which has long advocated for universal Education Savings Accounts, praised Treasurer Dan Schwartz for his work in implementing Nevada’s ESA program. NPRI Executive Vice President Victor Joecks offered the following comments:

The Treasurer’s Office has been very proactive in making sure that this desperately needed school choice is available for families looking for new options when it comes to their child’s education.

While families will not receive ESA funding until April 2016, the early application allows parents of public school students to move their children into private school for the start of the 2015-2016 school year so they can begin reaping the benefits of an education that is tailored to their unique needs.

Though families who choose to move their child out of public school in the fall will need to pay for their child’s education until the ESA funds become available, this is a sacrifice many parents have expressed their willingness to make, to ensure their children of the best education possible.

Joecks also noted that questions have been raised about the application process starting before January 1. He urged parents to read the law or contact the Treasurer’s Office if they had any questions.

If parents choose to move their child from public to private school for the upcoming school year, the ESA application must be received prior to the start of school in order to satisfy the 100-day public school requirement.

The Treasurer acknowledged the concerns of many families whose children are already in private school, home-based school or some other non-public education environment.

“The Treasurer’s Office is committed to drafting regulations that are both expansive and reflect legislative intent,” Treasurer Dan Schwartz said in a press release. “We especially hope to provide a clear picture on how parents can meet the 100-day requirement for their children.”

His office plans to hold additional public hearings on the regulations in September.

The open house that NPRI is holding Friday at its Las Vegas office, 7130 Placid St., Las Vegas, NV 89119, will celebrate the birthday of the father of the school choice movement, Milton Friedman.

Staff will be available to answer questions about Nevada’s ESA program and to assist parents who plan to file early applications.

More info:

###

Media Mentions

Policy director, Geoff Lawrence, was interviewed about CCSD’s hiring trend.

Las Vegas Review-Journal article featuring interview with Policy Director, Geoff Lawrence

Daily Signal article featuring quotes by Nevada Policy President, John Tsarpalas

Nevada Policy

Media Inquiries

Please put “Media” in the subject line and include your questions, deadline, and contact information, and we will respond as soon as possible.

Join the fight to save Nevada.

Sign up for Nevada Policy’s weekly emails to stay up to date on the most pressing issues facing Nevada today.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Media Inquiries

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.